The Magnetic North pole of Earth has been moving for centuries. Its movement is caused by the complex motion of molten iron and nickel within the Earth's outer core, which generates the magnetic field.

How Fast Is Magnetic North Moving?

Historically, magnetic north has drifted slowly, at about 10–15 km (6–9 miles) per year.

However, its movement has accelerated significantly since the 1990s, shifting at approximately 50–60 km (30–37 miles) per year.

As of recent measurements, magnetic north is moving from Canada toward Russia, specifically toward Siberia.

Why Is Magnetic North Moving?

The Earth’s magnetic field is generated by the movement of molten metals in the outer core (a process called the geodynamo).

Changes in this flow alter the distribution of magnetic forces, causing the north magnetic pole to shift unpredictably.

Scientists believe the current acceleration is due to a high-speed jet of liquid iron beneath Canada, which has weakened part of the field, allowing the pole to drift toward Russia.

Impact of Magnetic North’s Movement

Navigation Systems:

Magnetic compasses rely on magnetic north so that rapid shifts can affect air, sea, and land navigation.

The World Magnetic Model (WMM), which is used in GPS and navigation systems, must be updated more frequently.

Airports periodically rename runways based on shifting magnetic headings.

Aviation and Military Operations:

Pilots, especially those flying in polar regions, must adjust their navigation based on the changing pole position.

The U.S. and other militaries track these changes to maintain accurate missile and satellite navigation.

Potential Link to a Pole Reversal?

Scientists have speculated whether the Earth is heading toward a magnetic pole reversal (where north and south magnetic poles swap places).

Magnetic reversals have occurred several times in Earth's history but take thousands of years to complete.

There is no immediate evidence that a complete reversal is happening soon.

The development of the Estlink HVDC submarine power cables was a collaborative effort involving various organizations, leaders, and individuals.

Key Individuals and Groups Responsible for Estlink

Andres Tropp (Eesti Energia):

A prominent figure in Estonia’s energy sector during the early 2000s.

Advocated for energy independence and closer integration with European energy markets.

Instrumental in forming the consortium of energy companies that initiated Estlink 1.

Jukka Ruusunen (Fingrid CEO):

A Finnish energy leader deeply involved in facilitating the collaboration between Finland and Estonia.

Played a significant role in overseeing the transition of Estlink ownership to Fingrid and Elering in 2013.

Political Leaders

Andrus Ansip (Prime Minister of Estonia, 2005–2014):

Strongly supported Estonia’s energy independence from Russia.

Advocated for regional cooperation to integrate Baltic electricity markets into the Nordic grid.

Alexander Stubb (Prime Minister of Finland, later Foreign Minister):

Encouraged Finland’s active participation in cross-border energy projects with the Baltics.

Advocated for EU funding and policy support for Estlink 2.

Günther Oettinger (2010–2014):

As European Commissioner for Energy, Oettinger prioritized infrastructure projects like Estlink 2 under the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR).

Secured €100 million in EU funding for Estlink 2.

Supported Baltic States’ efforts to integrate with the European energy grid.

European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E):

Coordinated the technical and regulatory frameworks to ensure compatibility between the Baltic and Nordic grids.

Technical Experts and Contractors

ABB Group:

The Swiss-Swedish engineering company responsible for designing, constructing, and installing both Estlink 1 and Estlink 2.

Key figures within ABB:

Ulrich Spiesshofer (CEO during Estlink 2's completion phase): Oversaw ABB’s global energy infrastructure projects.

Engineering teams specializing in HVDC Light technology.

Transmission System Operators (TSOs)

Elering (Estonia):

Led by executives like Taavi Veskimägi, Elering played a central role in operating and maintaining the Estlink cables after acquiring ownership in 2013.

Advocated for Estonia’s deeper integration with European energy systems.

Fingrid (Finland):

Worked closely with Elering to manage the technical and financial aspects of the Estlink projects.

Energy Consortium for Estlink 1:

Eesti Energia (Estonia)

Latvenergo (Latvia)

Lietuvos Energija (Lithuania)

Pohjolan Voima (Finland)

This consortium initiated Estlink 1 as the first interconnection between the Baltic States and the Nordic grid.

Public Ownership Transition:

In 2013, the ownership of Estlink 1 was transferred to the TSOs (Elering and Fingrid), ensuring its operation as a public infrastructure asset.

Eastern Ukraine:

Russian Advances: Russian forces have intensified their offensive operations in the Donetsk region, capturing key locations such as Vuhledar on October 1, 2024. This strategic gain has allowed Russia to exert increased pressure on Ukrainian defenses in the area.

Ukrainian Counteractions: Despite facing challenges, Ukrainian forces continue to mount resistance and conduct counteroffensives. In early December, Ukraine regained control of Novyi Komar village in Donetsk Oblast, demonstrating their ongoing efforts to reclaim occupied territories.

Kursk Region Incursion:

In August 2024, Ukrainian forces launched an incursion into Russia's Kursk Oblast, reportedly capturing up to 350 square kilometers of territory. This operation signifies Ukraine's strategic initiative to disrupt Russian supply lines and apply pressure beyond its borders.

Involvement of North Korean Troops:

Reports indicate that North Korea has deployed approximately 10,000 to 12,000 troops to support Russia's military efforts in Ukraine. These forces have suffered significant casualties, with estimates of around 3,000 soldiers killed or injured, particularly in the Kursk region.

Recent Attacks and International Responses:

On December 25, 2024, Russia conducted large-scale missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities, including Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk, targeting energy infrastructure and resulting in civilian casualties. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned these attacks as "inhuman," especially given their timing during the holiday season.

In response to the ongoing conflict, U.S. President Joe Biden has pledged to expedite military aid to Ukraine, aiming to bolster its defense capabilities amid escalating tensions.

After the First World War, Syria and Lebanon were ruled by France under a League of Nations mandate, following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire. The governance structure, known as the French Mandate for Syria and Lebanon, officially began in 1923 and lasted until the mid-1940s. Here’s an overview of how France administered these territories:

Background:

1. Post-Ottoman Arrangement:

   • After World War I, the Ottoman Empire’s Middle Eastern territories were divided among the victors under the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916). This agreement anticipated French control of Syria and Lebanon.

   • The League of Nations granted France the formal mandate for these territories in 1923, based on its claim to historical and cultural ties in the region and its military presence after the war.

1. Initial Occupation:

1. • French military forces entered the region in 1920, defeating local resistance at the Battle of Maysalun and taking control of Damascus, the political and cultural heart of Syria.

Governance Structure:

1. Division into States:

   • France divided the Syrian mandate into several states along sectarian and regional lines to weaken nationalist unity:

     • State of Damascus

     • State of Aleppo

     • Alawite State (later Latakia)

     • Jabal Druze

     • Greater Lebanon (separated as a distinct entity, eventually becoming modern Lebanon)

   • This divide-and-rule strategy exploited ethnic and religious divisions to maintain control.

1. Direct French Rule:

1. • France retained significant administrative authority over the region, appointing governors and officials and controlling foreign policy, security, and economic decisions.

1. Constitutional Development:

1. • France introduced constitutions in Syria and Lebanon but maintained veto power over significant political decisions. Syrian efforts to gain independence were frequently rebuffed.

Resistance and Rebellion:

1. Syrian Nationalism:

   • Syrian nationalists resisted French rule, demanding independence and unification of the fragmented states.

   • The Great Syrian Revolt (1925–1927) was a large-scale uprising led by Druze leaders and Syrian nationalists, which France suppressed brutally using heavy military force.

1. Lebanese Response:

1. • In Lebanon, the French fostered closer ties with the Christian Maronite community, creating tensions between Christian and Muslim populations. This favoritism fueled long-term sectarian divides.

French Policies:

1. Economic Exploitation:

   • France developed infrastructure but largely directed resources to benefit French commercial interests. Agriculture, trade, and industries like silk production were integrated into the French economy.

1. Cultural Influence:

1. • France sought to promote French culture, language, and education, particularly in urban areas, creating a Francophone elite class.

1. Military Presence:

1. • French troops were stationed throughout Syria and Lebanon to enforce order, quell uprisings, and secure French interests.

Toward Independence:

1. World War II Impact:

   • During World War II, the Vichy French government initially controlled the region, but Free French forces, backed by Britain, took over in 1941.

   • Amid growing nationalist pressure and international support for independence, France agreed to gradually transfer power.

1. Full Independence:

1. • Lebanon gained independence in 1943, followed by Syria in 1946, after prolonged negotiations and mounting resistance to continued French influence.

Legacy:

• The French Mandate left a mixed legacy:

  • Administrative Fragmentation: The division of territories by France sowed divisions that affected regional unity.

  • Sectarianism: French policies deepened sectarian divides, particularly in Lebanon, influencing future conflicts.

  • Nationalism: Harsh rule fueled strong nationalist movements, which ultimately led to independence.

Eli Cohen (1924–1965) was an Israeli spy who had a daring undercover operation in Syria during the 1960s. His remarkable ability to infiltrate Syrian high society and provide crucial intelligence to Israel remains a legendary tale of espionage.
b

Early Life and Recruitment:

Eli Cohen was born to Jewish parents of Syrian descent in Alexandria, Egypt.

As a young man, he was deeply influenced by Zionist ideals and supported the creation of the state of Israel.

After being expelled from Egypt during the anti-Jewish sentiment following the Suez Crisis in 1956, Cohen moved to Israel, where he was recruited by Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency, in 1960.

His fluency in Arabic, French, and Hebrew, as well as his ability to blend in seamlessly, made him an ideal candidate for covert operations.

Undercover Identity in Syria:

Cohen was given the identity of "Kamel Amin Thaabet," a wealthy Syrian businessman returning to his homeland after living in Argentina. In 1961, he infiltrated Syrian society, quickly gaining the trust of military and political elites.

His charm, intelligence, and generosity allowed him to attend high-level gatherings, where he gathered critical information about Syria's military and political strategies.

Espionage Achievements:

Cohen's intelligence contributions were monumental. He provided detailed reports on Syrian fortifications in the Golan Heights, which proved invaluable during the Six-Day War in 1967.

One famous anecdote describes how Cohen suggested planting eucalyptus trees near Syrian military installations to provide shade for soldiers—a suggestion that allowed Israeli forces to identify and target these locations during the war.

Discovery and Capture:

In 1965, Syrian counterintelligence, with assistance from Soviet experts, detected unusual radio transmissions from Cohen's Damascus apartment. After his capture, Cohen was interrogated, tried in a secretive military court, and sentenced to death. Despite international appeals for clemency, including from Pope Paul VI and French President Charles de Gaulle, Syria executed him by public hanging on May 18, 1965.

Legacy:

Eli Cohen's bravery and sacrifice are deeply honored in Israel. He is remembered as a national hero, and his intelligence work is credited with saving countless lives.

His remains have not been returned to Israel, despite ongoing efforts by Israeli authorities.

His story has been the subject of books, films, and the 2019 Netflix series The Spy, starring Sacha Baron Cohen, which dramatized his life and work.

Early History and Origins

Emergence in the 9th Century:

The Alawite sect emerged around the 9th century in what is now modern-day Iraq and Syria.

The sect's name, Nusayris, is derived from Muhammad ibn Nusayr, a disciple of the 10th Shia Imam, Ali al-Hadi (828–868). He is believed to have played a pivotal role in shaping Alawite theology.

Theological Foundations:

Alawites are a branch of Shia Islam, venerating Ali ibn Abi Talib, the cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet Muhammad. However, their beliefs diverged significantly, emphasizing esotericism, mysticism, and elements from other religious traditions.

Their theology includes beliefs in divine emanations, reincarnation, and the veneration of a divine triad: Ali, Muhammad, and Salman the Persian.

Spread to Syria:

The sect migrated from Iraq to the mountainous regions of western Syria to escape persecution by Sunni Muslim rulers during the Abbasid Caliphate.

Medieval History

Persecution and Isolation:

Under the Abbasids, and later the Ottoman Empire, Alawites were often viewed as heretics by Sunni Muslim authorities. This led to widespread discrimination and marginalization.

To protect themselves, Alawites retreated to the rugged mountains of the Latakia region in modern-day Syria, where they lived in isolated communities.

Religious Marginalization:

Alawite beliefs, which incorporate elements of pre-Islamic religions, Christianity, and Gnosticism, further distanced them from mainstream Sunni and Shia Islam.

This isolation reinforced their identity as a secretive and tightly-knit community.

Ottoman Era (1516–1918)

Subjugation under Ottoman Rule:

During the Ottoman Empire, Alawites were marginalized as second-class citizens and forced into servitude by Sunni landlords in the coastal regions.

The Ottomans, like their predecessors, regarded Alawites as heretics and made little effort to integrate them into the broader Islamic society.

French Mandate Period (1920–1946)

Empowerment by the French:

After the fall of the Ottoman Empire, the French gained control of Syria under the League of Nations Mandate.

The French used a divide-and-rule strategy, favoring minority groups, including Alawites, to weaken Sunni Arab nationalism.

Alawites were heavily recruited into the military and administrative roles, creating new opportunities for upward mobility.

Creation of Alawite State:

In 1922, the French established the State of the Alawites as part of their mandate. While it was later integrated into modern Syria, this period marked the first time Alawites gained political significance.

Rise to Power in Modern Syria

Post-Independence Marginalization (1946–1963):

After Syria gained independence in 1946, Sunni elites dominated the political and economic spheres, leaving Alawites marginalized once again.

However, the military, which had grown in importance during the French Mandate, remained a pathway for Alawite advancement.

Ba'athist Coup and Alawite Ascendancy (1963–1970):

The Ba'ath Party, a secular Arab nationalist movement, seized power in Syria in 1963. Alawite officers gained significant influence within the party and the military.

In 1970, Hafez al-Assad, an Alawite Air Force officer, orchestrated a coup, becoming Syria’s president and consolidating Alawite dominance.

Under Hafez al-Assad and Bashar al-Assad

Hafez al-Assad (1971–2000):

Hafez al-Assad solidified Alawite control over Syria's political, military, and intelligence institutions.

His regime emphasized secularism and Arab nationalism to unify the country, while ensuring the Alawite community retained significant power.

Bashar al-Assad (2000–present):

Bashar al-Assad succeeded his father in 2000. His regime faced growing opposition, culminating in the Syrian Civil War (2011–present).

During the war, the Assad regime has relied heavily on the Alawite community for support, deepening sectarian divides.

Modern Context

Alawite Role in the Syrian Civil War:

The civil war has exacerbated sectarian tensions between Alawites, who largely back the Assad regime, and the Sunni Muslim majority.

Alawites have faced existential threats from extremist groups that view them as heretics, further binding them to the Assad regime for survival.

Demographics and Influence:

Alawites make up about 10–15% of Syria’s population but hold disproportionate political and military power.

The community's reliance on the Assad regime has made them vulnerable to backlash in a post-Assad future.

As of November 29, 2024, Russia occupies approximately 18% of Ukraine's territory, encompassing parts of the following regions:

• Crimea: Annexed by Russia in 2014, the Crimean Peninsula remains under Russian control.

• Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts: Collectively known as the Donbas region, these areas have experienced significant conflict since 2014. Russia declared the annexation of these territories in September 2022, but does not fully control them.

• Kherson and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts: In 2022, Russian forces occupied portions of these southern regions. Despite declaring annexation, Russia does not have complete control over these areas.

The front lines remain dynamic, with ongoing military operations leading to changes in territorial control. Recent reports indicate that Russian forces have made rapid advances in eastern Ukraine, capturing significant territory in regions such as Donetsk and Luhansk.

It's important to note that the international community, including the United Nations, does not recognize Russia's annexation of these Ukrainian territories.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) was established on October 15, 1966, by an act of Congress and officially began operations on April 1, 1967. It was created to consolidate federal transportation functions under one umbrella, addressing the increasing complexity of the nation's transportation systems and the need for coordinated policy-making.

 Current Structure, Responsibilities, and Numbers

 Employment

- The DOT employs approximately 55,000 people, including full-time federal employees and contractors, across its various branches and agencies.

Divisions and Branches

The DOT oversees 13 agencies with distinct responsibilities:

1. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Regulates and oversees civil aviation.

2. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): Manages the national highway system.

3. Federal Transit Administration (FTA): Oversees public transit systems.

4. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA): Regulates railroads and promotes rail safety.

5. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA): Promotes vehicle safety and road safety standards.

6. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA): Ensures safe transportation of hazardous materials.

7. Maritime Administration (MARAD): Promotes and regulates the U.S. merchant marine and waterborne transportation.

8. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA): Regulates the trucking industry.

9. Office of the Secretary (OST): Provides overall policy and leadership.

10. Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLS): Maintains and operates the seaway.

11. Office of Inspector General (OIG): Conducts audits and investigations.

12. Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (SLSDC): Focuses on seaway operations.

13. Build America Bureau: Supports infrastructure investments and innovation.

 Budget

- The DOT’s annual budget is typically around $87 billion, funding transportation infrastructure, safety programs, and research initiatives.

 Key Responsibilities

- Safety Regulation: Establishing safety standards for all modes of transportation.

- Infrastructure Development: Overseeing construction and maintenance of roads, bridges, airports, and ports.

- Policy Making: Coordinating national transportation policies and priorities.

- Innovation: Supporting the development of autonomous vehicles, electric vehicles, and modernized air traffic systems.

- Public Transit Support: Providing grants to improve urban and rural transit systems.

 Key Figures and Circumstances Behind Its Creation

1. President Lyndon B. Johnson:

   - President Johnson was a central figure in the creation of the DOT. He championed its establishment as part of his broader vision for modernizing America's infrastructure and ensuring safety and efficiency in transportation. He signed the Department of Transportation Act into law in 1966.

2. Alan S. Boyd:

   - Alan S. Boyd was the first Secretary of Transportation, sworn in on January 16, 1967. He played a pivotal role in shaping the department during its formative years.

   - Background:

     - Before becoming Secretary of Transportation, Boyd served as the Chairman of the Civil Aeronautics Board and the Under Secretary of Commerce for Transportation. These roles gave him valuable experience in managing and regulating complex transportation systems.

Alan S. Boyd (July 20, 1922 – October 18, 2020) was an influential figure in U.S. transportation history, known as the first Secretary of Transportation and a trailblazer in the aviation and transportation industries.

 Early Life and Education

- Born: July 20, 1922, in Jacksonville, Florida.

- Education:

  - Graduated from the University of Florida in 1941.

  - Earned a law degree from the University of Virginia in 1948 after serving in World War II.

 Military Service

- Boyd served in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War II, where he gained firsthand knowledge of aviation that would later influence his career.

 Career Highlights

1. Early Career in Transportation:

   - Boyd worked as a lawyer specializing in transportation law, which marked the beginning of his deep involvement in the field.

2. Chairman of the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) (1961–1965):

   - Appointed by President John F. Kennedy, Boyd became the youngest CAB chairman in history.

   - He helped usher in a new era of air travel, focusing on deregulation and modernization.

   - Advocated for fair competition and affordable airfares, promoting growth in the aviation sector.

3. Under Secretary of Commerce for Transportation (1965–1967):

   - Boyd served in the Department of Commerce, where he oversaw transportation policies and programs. His work there set the stage for the creation of the Department of Transportation.

4. First Secretary of Transportation (1967–1969):

   - Appointed by President Lyndon B. Johnson as the first Secretary of the newly established U.S. Department of Transportation.

   - Boyd unified disparate federal transportation agencies under one umbrella, fostering better coordination and efficiency.

   - Focused on aviation safety, highway infrastructure, and urban transportation issues.

   - Promoted innovation in transportation policy and systematized safety protocols across various modes of transit.

5. Later Career:

   - President of Illinois Central Railroad (1969–1972): Boyd shifted focus to the private sector, helping modernize one of the nation's key railroads.

   - President of Amtrak (1978–1982): Boyd played a significant role in guiding the national passenger rail system through its formative years, addressing operational and financial challenges.

 Legacy and Recognition

- Boyd is celebrated as a pioneer in U.S. transportation policy, advocating for modernization, safety, and efficiency across all modes of transit.

- His leadership during the creation of the DOT solidified the department’s role as a cornerstone of American infrastructure development.

 Personal Life and Passing

- Boyd married Flavil Townsend in 1943, and they had two children.

- He passed away on October 18, 2020, in Seattle, Washington, at the age of 98. Boyd's career left an enduring impact on U.S. transportation systems and policies.

 Major Controversies Involving the DOT

1. Airline Deregulation (1978)

   - The Airline Deregulation Act, passed during President Jimmy Carter's administration, marked a significant shift in DOT policy. While deregulation reduced fares and increased competition, it led to controversies such as the decline of smaller regional airlines and reduced service to rural areas.

2. Infrastructure Funding Shortfalls

   - Controversy has frequently surrounded the funding and management of infrastructure projects, including debates over gas tax increases, mismanagement of highway funds, and disputes between federal and state governments over spending priorities.

3. Highway Safety Standards

   - The DOT’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has faced criticism over its handling of vehicle recalls, such as the Takata airbag scandal and the General Motors ignition switch defects, both of which were linked to fatalities.

4. Air Traffic Modernization (NextGen)

   - The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), a part of the DOT, has struggled with implementing NextGen, a multibillion-dollar program to modernize air traffic control. Delays, budget overruns, and resistance from airlines and air traffic controllers have plagued the program.

5. Bridge and Tunnel Safety

   - High-profile disasters like the collapse of the I-35W Mississippi River Bridge in 2007 raised questions about DOT oversight and funding of bridge safety programs.

6. Pipeline Safety

   - The DOT’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) has faced scrutiny for its response to major pipeline spills, such as the 2010 Kalamazoo River oil spill, which was the largest inland oil spill in U.S. history.

7. High-Speed Rail Projects

   - DOT’s support for high-speed rail has sparked controversy, particularly in California, where costs for the state’s bullet train project ballooned, leading to criticism of DOT’s oversight and allocation of federal funds.

8. Climate Change Policies

   - Recent controversies have included debates over the DOT’s role in promoting electric vehicles (EVs) and fuel efficiency standards, with conflicts between industry groups, environmentalists, and state governments.

Simon Ramo is frequently cited as the father of the US Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) system and the founder of systems engineering.
Ramo later created Space Technology Laboratories (STL) as a subsidiary of Ramo-Wooldridge Corp. a year before the USSR’s Sputnik launch. STL was the first US company to receive a contract for a spacecraft from the newly established National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). An STL spacecraft was the first to reach the outer planets and to go beyond the solar system into far outer space.

Ramo held more than 40 patents, the last of which he received at the age of 100. Thus, he is the oldest patent holder in US history.

He received numerous awards and honors, including the National Medal of Science (1979) from President Jimmy Carter for his pioneering work in electronics research and development. President Gerald Ford appointed him chair of the President’s Advisory Committee on Science and Technology. In 1983, he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian award, from President Ronald Reagan. He was inducted into the Business Hall of Fame and, in 1999, received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Smithsonian Institution.

He died June 27, 2016, at age 103, in his home in Santa Monica.

Ukraine could benefit from more precise and powerful artillery systems and advanced missiles to enhance its combat effectiveness. Here’s how each option could improve their military capabilities:

 1. More Precise and Powerful Artillery

Ukraine uses 155mm artillery extensively, but more advanced versions with precision-guided capabilities and longer ranges could make a significant difference. Some examples include:

- 155mm Excalibur Shells: These are precision-guided artillery rounds that use GPS to strike targets within a few meters of accuracy, even at long ranges. Excalibur shells would allow Ukrainian forces to destroy high-value targets with fewer rounds, making their artillery more efficient. These shells are especially useful in urban environments or for hitting key logistical nodes and command centres without causing excessive collateral damage.

- Long-Range Artillery Systems: Systems like the M1299 self-propelled howitzer, which can fire precision 155mm rounds at ranges up to 70 km (compared to the 30-40 km range of current systems), would give Ukraine a significant range advantage over Russian artillery, allowing it to strike deeper behind enemy lines.

- Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS): Ukraine has already received M270 and HIMARS systems, which are incredibly effective due to their long range and accuracy. These systems use GPS-guided rockets and can launch up to 12 missiles at once, precisely hitting targets over 80 km away. Increasing the supply of HIMARS or providing longer-range munitions could further improve Ukraine's ability to hit key Russian positions.

2. Missiles for Greater Combat Effectiveness

Missiles, especially those with long-range and precision-guided capabilities, would significantly boost Ukraine’s ability to strike critical targets far behind enemy lines, disrupting Russian logistics, command structures, and air defence systems.

- ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System): This is a long-range tactical missile capable of striking targets up to 300 km away. If supplied to Ukraine, ATACMS would enable Ukrainian forces to hit Russian command posts, ammo depots, and infrastructure deep in Russian-held territories. This could force Russia to push its logistics and command centres further, complicating its supply lines.

- Longer-Range Air Defense Missiles: While Ukraine has already received NASAMS and Patriot systems, longer-range air defence and surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) would help neutralise Russian air superiority, protecting Ukrainian troops from Russian missile and aircraft strikes. Systems like SAMP/T (which Ukraine has been promised) can intercept both aircraft and ballistic missiles at longer ranges.

-Harpoon Anti-Ship Missiles: Ukraine has also successfully used Harpoon missiles to target Russian naval assets. Continuing to receive such missiles would help Ukraine maintain control over its Black Sea coast and prevent Russian forces from launching amphibious operations or blockading key ports.

One of the most infamous "hot mic" moments during a U.S. presidential campaign occurred in 2012 when then-President Barack Obama was caught on a hot mic during a conversation with then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. The incident happened at a nuclear security summit in Seoul, South Korea.

The Comment:

Obama was heard saying to Medvedev, "This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility." Medvedev responded, "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir." The "Vladimir" in question was Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Context and Reaction:
The comment was made about negotiations about missile defence systems between the U.S. and Russia. Obama was signalling that he would be better positioned to negotiate after the 2012 election when re-election concerns would no longer constrain him.

The 'hot mic' moment sparked a firestorm of controversy, particularly among Republicans. They accused Obama of signalling to Russia that he would make concessions after the election. This incident became a heated talking point in the 2012 campaign, with critics arguing that it revealed a potential weakness in foreign policy.

Legacy:

The comment is often remembered as one of the most significant hot mic moments in U.S. presidential politics, raising questions about diplomatic transparency and the influence of electoral politics on international negotiations.