The name Gaza has ancient origins and has been used for thousands of years to refer to the city and region in what is now the Gaza Strip. The name’s meaning and history trace back to various languages and civilizations.

Origins of the Name "Gaza"

Ancient Semitic Roots—The name Gaza comes from ancient Semitic languages, likely related to the Hebrew and Canaanite word ʿAzzā (עַזָּה), which means “strong” or “fortified.”

Egyptian Influence – The Egyptians called the city “Ghazzat”, an important strategic city along trade routes.

Greek and Roman Period – The Greeks and Romans called it Gaza, a name that persisted over time.

Arabic Name – In Arabic, the city is called غزة (Ghazza), which retains the ancient Semitic root.

Strategic Location – Gaza has historically been a fortified city, controlling important trade routes between Egypt, the Levant, and Mesopotamia.

Cultural and Military Importance – It was a key city for many empires, from the Philistines and Ancient Egyptians to the Ottomans and British.

An Israeli startup named FireDome has developed an innovative wildfire defense system inspired by the country's renowned Iron Dome missile defense technology. 

Established in 2024 by CEO Gadi Benjamini and Dr. Adi Naor Pomerantz, FireDome aims to enhance firefighting capabilities by rapidly responding to wildfires.

Key Features of the FireDome System:

Autonomous Operation: The system is designed to function autonomously, detecting and responding to wildfires without direct human intervention.

Eco-Friendly Fire Retardant: FireDome utilizes capsules filled with environmentally friendly fire retardant. These capsules are launched to create protective barriers against approaching fires.

AI-Powered Detection: The system leverages artificial intelligence to detect spot fires caused by wind-blown embers and suppresses them promptly, preventing the spread of wildfires.

Mechanical Launchers: The system employs mechanical launchers that project the fire-retardant capsules to distances of about a quarter mile, allowing for rapid deployment over large areas.

Deployment Plans:

Initial Testing in Israel: FireDome plans to conduct its first system tests in Israel around May 2025. The tests will focus on areas prone to wildfires, such as the forests near Jerusalem and the Carmel region.

Expansion to the United States: In 2026, the company aims to initiate pilot programs in the United States, particularly in wildfire-prone regions like Los Angeles and San Francisco. By integrating advanced defense strategies with artificial intelligence, FireDome seeks to provide a proactive solution to the growing threat of wildfires, enhancing the capabilities of traditional firefighting methods.

For a visual overview of FireDome's technology and its potential applications, you can watch the following video:

The uneven ratio in prisoner exchanges, where Israel releases more detainees than the number of hostages Hamas returns, is often due to several key factors:

Hostage Value:

Hostages held by Hamas, especially civilians or soldiers, are viewed as highly valuable bargaining chips. Their return is prioritized due to intense public and political pressure in Israel.

Asymmetry in Prisoner Profiles:

Many of the individuals Israel detains are accused or convicted of crimes related to terrorism or violence, but they often outnumber hostages captured by Hamas.

The exchange reflects this imbalance, as Hamas demands a higher number of detainees to justify releasing a smaller group of hostages.

Public Opinion and Humanitarian Concerns:

Israel faces significant domestic and international pressure to secure the return of its citizens, regardless of the cost. This humanitarian emphasis often leads to concessions favoring Hamas's terms.

Many Israelis support these exchanges due to the Jewish cultural and religious emphasis on the value of life (the principle of pikuach nefesh, saving a life). Families of hostages often lead campaigns for their loved ones' return, regardless of the terms.

There is significant public and political criticism of the imbalance. Critics argue that releasing large numbers of convicted criminals, including individuals involved in deadly attacks, poses a security risk and incentivizes future hostage-taking by groups like Hamas.

Examples of Debate:

The 2011 exchange of over 1,000 prisoners for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit sparked extensive debate. Some argued it was necessary to fulfill Israel’s commitment to its citizens, while others viewed it as undermining deterrence.

Israel's willingness to exchange live prisoners for the bodies of deceased Israelis stems from a combination of cultural, religious, political, and social factors that shape its policies and public sentiment. Here’s an explanation of the key reasons:

Cultural and Religious Values

Jewish tradition strongly emphasises kavod hamet (honoring the dead) and pikuach nefesh (preservation of life). 

Even in death, ensuring that Israeli soldiers or civilians are buried in their homeland according to Jewish customs is a deeply held value.

Judaism emphasizes communal responsibility, where every member of society is seen as part of a larger collective. This sense of duty extends to recovering the remains of soldiers and citizens.

"No One Left Behind" Policy: Israel has a deeply ingrained ethos of leaving no soldier behind, whether alive or deceased. This principle is reinforced by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and widely supported by the public.

The state sees recovering the remains of its citizens as a moral duty to the families and a demonstration of the nation's commitment to its people.

Ensuring that every effort will be made to retrieve soldiers, even after death, is vital for maintaining trust and morale within the IDF.

Israeli society places immense pressure on the government to recover both hostages and the bodies of the deceased. Families of fallen soldiers often become highly vocal advocates, rallying public support.

Bringing fallen soldiers home is seen as reclaiming a measure of dignity and sovereignty, even in tragic circumstances.

By engaging in exchanges for bodies, Israel signals its commitment to the principle of leaving no one behind, even if the terms seem asymmetrical. This approach can also set precedents for future negotiations.

Such exchanges often involve international mediators (e.g., Egypt, Qatar, or the Red Cross), enabling Israel to strengthen diplomatic ties or leverage these relationships in broader negotiations.

Groups like Hamas and Hezbollah often exploit captured bodies as psychological leverage. By retrieving remains, Israel denies them a propaganda tool and provides closure to grieving families.

High-profile exchanges, though controversial, often unite the nation by demonstrating a collective commitment to shared values.

Historical Examples

Goldwasser and Regev (2008): Israel released five Lebanese prisoners, including Samir Kuntar, in exchange for the remains of IDF soldiers Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser.

Hadar Goldin and Oron Shaul (2014): Efforts to recover the remains of these soldiers, killed in Gaza during Operation Protective Edge, have been ongoing, with the public and families pressuring the government to secure their return.

Yemen’s status as a failed or fragile state stems from a complex history of political fragmentation, external interference, resource scarcity, and socio-economic challenges. While Yemen’s current crisis is rooted in recent conflicts, the underlying causes trace back over a century.

North-South Divide:

Yemen was historically divided into two separate entities:

North Yemen: Dominated by tribal confederations and ruled by Imams under a Zaidi Shia theocracy until 1962.

South Yemen: Colonized by the British in the mid-19th century, later becoming a Marxist state after independence in 1967.

Colonial Era:

The Ottoman Empire controlled parts of Yemen until its collapse in 1918, followed by British colonial rule in Aden (South Yemen).

During the Cold War, North Yemen was backed by Saudi Arabia and the West, while South Yemen aligned with the Soviet Union.

Proxy conflicts between these two spheres of influence further destabilized the region.

Yemen has been a battleground for Saudi-Iranian competition, with both powers funding and arming opposing factions (e.g., Saudi Arabia supports the Yemeni government, while Iran backs the Houthi movement).

The unification of North and South Yemen created a fragile state with deep political and cultural divisions.

Disputes over power-sharing led to a civil war in 1994, exacerbating distrust between northern and southern factions.

Saleh, who ruled Yemen from 1978 to 2012, relied on patronage networks, corruption, and alliances with tribal leaders to maintain power.

Yemen has limited natural resources compared to its Gulf neighbors, with declining oil reserves and chronic water shortages.

Agriculture, the backbone of the economy, has been hindered by droughts, mismanagement, and over-reliance on qat (a water-intensive cash crop chewed for its stimulant effects).

Yemen is one of the poorest countries in the Arab world, with high unemployment and limited access to education and healthcare.

Sunni Muslims (mostly Shafi’i) dominate southern and coastal areas, while Zaidi Shia Muslims are concentrated in the north.

Though Yemenis share a long history of coexistence, sectarian divisions have been exacerbated by regional power struggles and the rise of extremist groups.

Houthi Insurgency:

The Houthi movement, a Zaidi Shia group, began as a rebellion against marginalization in the 1990s.

The conflict escalated in 2014 when the Houthis seized the capital, Sana’a, leading to the current civil war.

Saudi-Led Intervention (2015–Present):

A coalition led by Saudi Arabia launched a military intervention to restore the internationally recognized government, further devastating the country.

Al-Qaeda and ISIS:

Yemen has become a stronghold for extremist groups like Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and ISIS, complicating efforts to stabilize the state.

After the First World War, Syria and Lebanon were ruled by France under a League of Nations mandate, following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire. The governance structure, known as the French Mandate for Syria and Lebanon, officially began in 1923 and lasted until the mid-1940s. Here’s an overview of how France administered these territories:

Background:

1. Post-Ottoman Arrangement:

   • After World War I, the Ottoman Empire’s Middle Eastern territories were divided among the victors under the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916). This agreement anticipated French control of Syria and Lebanon.

   • The League of Nations granted France the formal mandate for these territories in 1923, based on its claim to historical and cultural ties in the region and its military presence after the war.

1. Initial Occupation:

1. • French military forces entered the region in 1920, defeating local resistance at the Battle of Maysalun and taking control of Damascus, the political and cultural heart of Syria.

Governance Structure:

1. Division into States:

   • France divided the Syrian mandate into several states along sectarian and regional lines to weaken nationalist unity:

     • State of Damascus

     • State of Aleppo

     • Alawite State (later Latakia)

     • Jabal Druze

     • Greater Lebanon (separated as a distinct entity, eventually becoming modern Lebanon)

   • This divide-and-rule strategy exploited ethnic and religious divisions to maintain control.

1. Direct French Rule:

1. • France retained significant administrative authority over the region, appointing governors and officials and controlling foreign policy, security, and economic decisions.

1. Constitutional Development:

1. • France introduced constitutions in Syria and Lebanon but maintained veto power over significant political decisions. Syrian efforts to gain independence were frequently rebuffed.

Resistance and Rebellion:

1. Syrian Nationalism:

   • Syrian nationalists resisted French rule, demanding independence and unification of the fragmented states.

   • The Great Syrian Revolt (1925–1927) was a large-scale uprising led by Druze leaders and Syrian nationalists, which France suppressed brutally using heavy military force.

1. Lebanese Response:

1. • In Lebanon, the French fostered closer ties with the Christian Maronite community, creating tensions between Christian and Muslim populations. This favoritism fueled long-term sectarian divides.

French Policies:

1. Economic Exploitation:

   • France developed infrastructure but largely directed resources to benefit French commercial interests. Agriculture, trade, and industries like silk production were integrated into the French economy.

1. Cultural Influence:

1. • France sought to promote French culture, language, and education, particularly in urban areas, creating a Francophone elite class.

1. Military Presence:

1. • French troops were stationed throughout Syria and Lebanon to enforce order, quell uprisings, and secure French interests.

Toward Independence:

1. World War II Impact:

   • During World War II, the Vichy French government initially controlled the region, but Free French forces, backed by Britain, took over in 1941.

   • Amid growing nationalist pressure and international support for independence, France agreed to gradually transfer power.

1. Full Independence:

1. • Lebanon gained independence in 1943, followed by Syria in 1946, after prolonged negotiations and mounting resistance to continued French influence.

Legacy:

• The French Mandate left a mixed legacy:

  • Administrative Fragmentation: The division of territories by France sowed divisions that affected regional unity.

  • Sectarianism: French policies deepened sectarian divides, particularly in Lebanon, influencing future conflicts.

  • Nationalism: Harsh rule fueled strong nationalist movements, which ultimately led to independence.

Eli Cohen (1924–1965) was an Israeli spy who had a daring undercover operation in Syria during the 1960s. His remarkable ability to infiltrate Syrian high society and provide crucial intelligence to Israel remains a legendary tale of espionage.
b

Early Life and Recruitment:

Eli Cohen was born to Jewish parents of Syrian descent in Alexandria, Egypt.

As a young man, he was deeply influenced by Zionist ideals and supported the creation of the state of Israel.

After being expelled from Egypt during the anti-Jewish sentiment following the Suez Crisis in 1956, Cohen moved to Israel, where he was recruited by Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency, in 1960.

His fluency in Arabic, French, and Hebrew, as well as his ability to blend in seamlessly, made him an ideal candidate for covert operations.

Undercover Identity in Syria:

Cohen was given the identity of "Kamel Amin Thaabet," a wealthy Syrian businessman returning to his homeland after living in Argentina. In 1961, he infiltrated Syrian society, quickly gaining the trust of military and political elites.

His charm, intelligence, and generosity allowed him to attend high-level gatherings, where he gathered critical information about Syria's military and political strategies.

Espionage Achievements:

Cohen's intelligence contributions were monumental. He provided detailed reports on Syrian fortifications in the Golan Heights, which proved invaluable during the Six-Day War in 1967.

One famous anecdote describes how Cohen suggested planting eucalyptus trees near Syrian military installations to provide shade for soldiers—a suggestion that allowed Israeli forces to identify and target these locations during the war.

Discovery and Capture:

In 1965, Syrian counterintelligence, with assistance from Soviet experts, detected unusual radio transmissions from Cohen's Damascus apartment. After his capture, Cohen was interrogated, tried in a secretive military court, and sentenced to death. Despite international appeals for clemency, including from Pope Paul VI and French President Charles de Gaulle, Syria executed him by public hanging on May 18, 1965.

Legacy:

Eli Cohen's bravery and sacrifice are deeply honored in Israel. He is remembered as a national hero, and his intelligence work is credited with saving countless lives.

His remains have not been returned to Israel, despite ongoing efforts by Israeli authorities.

His story has been the subject of books, films, and the 2019 Netflix series The Spy, starring Sacha Baron Cohen, which dramatized his life and work.

The region spanning from Syria on the Mediterranean to the Suez Canal, often referred to historically as the Levant and Egypt, has seen periods of peace and prosperity under various empires and administrations. One period particularly stands out:

The Roman and Byzantine Eras (c. 1st century BCE to 7th century CE)

• Pax Romana (27 BCE – 180 CE):
  During this time, much of the region, including modern-day Syria, Lebanon, Israel/Palestine, and Egypt, was under Roman rule. The stability brought by the Pax Romana allowed for:

  • Economic prosperity was driven by agriculture, trade, and crafts.

  • Infrastructure development, including roads, aqueducts, and cities like Antioch, Caesarea, and Alexandria.

  • Cultural flourishing with Hellenistic, Roman, and local traditions blending in cities and ports.

• Byzantine Era (4th–7th centuries): The Eastern Roman Empire administered the Levant and Egypt effectively, maintaining trade routes and integrating Christian institutions, which became central to local culture. Despite occasional conflicts, prosperity persisted in key cities like Constantinople, Antioch, and Alexandria.

The Umayyad Caliphate (661–750 CE)

• Centered in Damascus, Syria, the Umayyads oversaw one of the most peaceful and prosperous periods for the Levant and Egypt. Highlights include:

  • Trade networks linking the Mediterranean, the Arabian Peninsula, and Asia.

  • Flourishing arts and architecture, including the Great Mosque of Damascus.

  • Efficient administration and integration of diverse religious and cultural groups.

The Fatimid Caliphate (969–1171 CE)

• The Fatimids, based in Egypt, established a stable and prosperous empire that extended into the Levant.

  • Cairo became a major cultural, intellectual, and economic hub.

  • The Caliphate encouraged trade in the Mediterranean and Red Sea, boosting regional wealth.

  • Religious tolerance allowed for coexistence among Muslims, Christians, and Jews.

Key Features of Prosperity and Peace in These Periods:

1. Economic Stability: Agricultural productivity and flourishing trade routes, such as the Silk Road and maritime trade networks.

2. Cultural Exchange: A blend of Greek, Roman, Persian, and local cultures enriched the intellectual and artistic life.

3. Infrastructure: Advanced urban planning, aqueducts, and irrigation systems facilitated growth.

4. Religious Tolerance: Empires that fostered coexistence among diverse religious and ethnic groups experienced fewer internal conflicts.

• "A judge who delivers a false judgment is considered as if he destroyed the world."

France has been a significant supplier of military equipment to Qatar in recent years, particularly in aircraft, helicopters, and armoured vehicles. Some of the most notable deals include:

Rafale Fighter Jets (€6.7 Billion)

Contract Overview: Qatar signed a deal with Dassault Aviation in 2015 for 24 Rafale fighter jets. In 2017, Qatar ordered an additional 12 jets, bringing the total to 36 Rafales.

2. NH90 Helicopters (€3 Billion)

Contract Overview: Qatar ordered 28 NH90 helicopters from Airbus Helicopters in 2018.

MBDA Missile Systems

Contract Overview: As part of Qatar’s broader defence deals with France, the Aster 30 surface-to-air missiles and Exocet anti-ship missiles were included in the contracts.

In Israel, Tel Aviv is known as one of the most dog-friendly cities in the world. With an estimated one dog for every 11 residents, this has earned Tel Aviv a reputation for having one of the highest rates of dog ownership globally, especially relative to population size.

The Story of "Hachiko" – The Israeli Version

  - One of the most touching stories in Israel is often compared to the story of Japan’s famous dog, Hachiko. In this case, a loyal Israeli dog would wait daily for his owner, a Holocaust survivor, to return to the bus station after work. Tragically, one day, the owner passed away, but the dog continued to wait for him at the station for years. Locals began caring for the dog, feeding and keeping him company. The dog's unwavering loyalty struck a deep chord with the community, making the story widely known in Israel.

  - The Oketz Unit, Israel’s elite canine special forces, is another famous source of dog stories. The dogs in this unit are trained for military missions, including tracking, detecting explosives, and search and rescue operations. Many of these dogs are considered national heroes for their bravery in saving lives during dangerous missions. For example, there are stories of dogs in the Oketz Unit who detected bombs during the Second Lebanon War and in various operations in Gaza, preventing potential casualties. When one of these dogs dies in action, they are often honoured as fallen soldiers.

The Story of Lu-Lu the Dog and Gilad Shalit

   - When Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit was held captive by Hamas (from 2006 to 2011), his family’s dog, Lu-Lu, became a symbol of loyalty and hope. The black Labrador remained by the Shalit family’s side, comforting them during their long ordeal. Upon Gilad Shalit's release, Gilad and Lu-Lu reunited, bolstering the family's emotional resilience and the power of a dog’s companionship.

The Hero Dog of the Carmel Fire

   - During the 2010 Carmel Forest Fire, one of the worst natural disasters in Israeli history, a heroic dog named Shira became known for her bravery. Shira, a mixed-breed dog, guided her owner and several others through thick smoke and out of danger as the fire approached their area. Her keen instincts and loyalty saved lives, and she was later honoured for her actions during the crisis.

Dogs Rescued During Operation Protective Edge

   - During the 2014 Gaza War, also known as Operation Protective Edge, there were several stories of soldiers being saved by military dogs from the Oketz Unit. In one instance, a dog named Levi detected a tunnel that Hamas fighters were using to stage an ambush on Israeli forces. Levi's discovery helped avert a potentially deadly surprise attack, making him a hero in the eyes of the soldiers.

The Story of "Nili"

   - In the early days of Israeli independence, a dog named Nili became famous for her work with the Haganah. This Jewish paramilitary organisation later became part of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). Nili was trained to deliver messages across dangerous terrain and often accompanied Jewish fighters during the tumultuous period before and after the founding of Israel. Her story is part of the broader history of how animals played roles in Israel's fight for survival.

The Trojan Horse concept—something harmful disguised as beneficial or harmless—has appeared throughout history, literature, and even modern cybersecurity. Here are some notable Trojan Horse scenarios and stories, ranging from ancient tales to contemporary strategies:

 The Original Trojan Horse (Ancient Greek Mythology)

   - Story: The term "Trojan Horse" originates from the Greek myth of the Trojan War, famously recounted in Homer’s "The Iliad" and later in Virgil's "The Aeneid". The Greeks, unable to breach the walls of Troy after a decade of war, devised a plan to deceive the Trojans. They built a giant wooden horse, hiding soldiers inside, and pretended to sail away. Believing the horse to be a peace offering, the Trojans brought it into the city. Greek soldiers emerged from the horse at night and opened the gates for the returning Greek army, but the city was sacked.

   - Outcome: This story remains one of the most famous examples of deception in history and gave rise to the term "Trojan Horse" for any trick that causes an opponent to invite a foe into a secure place.

 The Wooden Horse Escape (World War II)

   - Scenario: A real-life parallel to the mythical Trojan Horse occurred during World War II when British POWs at Stalag Luft III, a German POW camp, built a vaulting horse as part of an escape plan.

   - Trojan Horse Strategy: Under the guise of using the horse for exercise, the prisoners dug a tunnel beneath it, hiding their digging equipment and dirt inside. Every day, they would move the horse to the dig site, and while some men exercised above, others dug beneath. The horse was then moved back into the camp at the end of the day.

   - Outcome: Three prisoners successfully escaped using this method. This daring escape became famous and was the subject of the book and film "The Wooden Horse".

 The Battle of Carthage (146 BC)

   - Scenario: During the Third Punic War, the Roman Republic laid siege to Carthage. After breaching the city walls, the Romans faced fierce resistance from the Carthaginians, who had built barricades in the streets. To break the final resistance, the Romans used deception.

   - Trojan Horse Strategy: Roman soldiers pretended to retreat, luring the Carthaginians out of their fortified positions. When the defenders pursued, the Romans launched a surprise counterattack, capturing critical parts of the city.

   - Outcome: The city of Carthage was ultimately destroyed, marking the end of the Punic Wars. This feigned retreat tactic is a classic military Trojan Horse strategy.

The Siege of Alesia (52 BC)

   - Scenario: During Julius Caesar's conquest of Gaul, the Gallic leader Vercingetorix retreated to the fortified city of Alesia, where Caesar laid siege.

   - Trojan Horse Strategy: While Caesar built fortifications around the city, he also set traps and built fake retreats to lure Gallic reinforcements into ambushes. He employed deception to divide and weaken the Gallic forces while maintaining a double-layer siege.

   - Outcome: The siege was successful, and Caesar’s tactics, including deceptive strategies, led to the final defeat of the Gallic forces, cementing Roman control over Gaul.

Six human beings were murdered.