Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi is Keeping the U.S. Clean

In the United States, garbage is managed through a combination of recycling, landfills, incineration, and composting. Each method plays a specific role in reducing waste, conserving resources, and minimising environmental impacts. Here’s an overview of how waste management is handled in the U.S.

 1. Landfills

   - Primary Disposal Method: Landfills are the most common method of waste disposal, handling roughly 50% of the country’s municipal solid waste (MSW). There are over 3,000 active landfills in the U.S. and thousands of closed sites.

   - Design and Regulations: Modern landfills have environmental safeguards, such as liners to prevent groundwater contamination, methane gas collection systems, and leachate treatment to manage liquid waste. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates landfills under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to ensure they meet specific environmental standards.

   - Environmental Concerns: Landfills are associated with potential environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions (mainly methane), soil and groundwater contamination, and land use. Many landfills use gas capture systems to mitigate methane emissions, converting methane into energy.

2. Recycling

   - Recycling Rates: About 32% of U.S. waste is recycled. Recycling programs vary significantly by state and municipality, with specific areas achieving higher recycling rates due to better infrastructure and incentives.

   - Types of Recyclables: Commonly recycled materials include paper, cardboard, metals, glass, and certain plastics. Specialised facilities sort, clean, and process these materials, which are then sold and reused in manufacturing.

   - Challenges: Recycling faces challenges like contamination (when non-recyclable items mix with recyclables), fluctuating markets for recyclables, and limitations on certain plastics. The China Waste Ban in 2018 restricted imports of contaminated recyclables, prompting the U.S. to improve domestic recycling infrastructure.

   - Benefits: Recycling conserves resources, reduces energy usage, and decreases the need for raw materials. For example, recycling aluminum saves over 90% of the energy required to produce new aluminum from raw materials.

3. Composting

   - Organic Waste Processing: Composting is a growing method for managing food waste, yard trimmings, and other organic materials. Approximately 6% of MSW is composted in the U.S.

   - Facilities and Programs: Some municipalities offer curbside composting, but composting rates vary widely. Community composting programs, private facilities, and backyard composting help supplement municipal composting efforts.

   - Environmental Benefits: Composting reduces the volume of waste sent to landfills and produces nutrient-rich soil. Compost helps retain soil moisture, reduce erosion, and sequester carbon, making it environmentally beneficial for agricultural and landscaping uses.

4. Incineration (Waste-to-Energy)

   - Energy Generation: Waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities burn waste to generate electricity or heat. About 11% of U.S. waste is managed through incineration, primarily in areas with limited landfill space.

   - Environmental Controls: Modern incineration facilities use advanced pollution controls to capture emissions, reducing the release of harmful pollutants. However, they still produce carbon dioxide, and there is debate over their role in greenhouse gas emissions.

   - Pros and Cons: Incineration reduces the volume of waste going to landfills by about 75% but raises concerns about air pollution, particularly heavy metals and dioxins emissions.

5. Waste Reduction and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

   - Reduction Initiatives: The U.S. promotes waste reduction through public education, plastic bag bans, single-use plastic regulations, and incentives for reusing materials. These efforts focus on reducing waste at the source.

   - Extended Producer Responsibility: EPR programs place the responsibility for managing product waste on manufacturers, encouraging them to design products that are easier to recycle or dispose of. Some states have EPR laws for electronics, paint, and pharmaceutical products.

6. Electronic and Hazardous Waste Management

   - E-Waste: Electronic waste (e-waste) is processed through specialised recycling programs due to the presence of heavy metals and toxic substances. Some manufacturers offer take-back programs, and certain states have laws requiring e-waste recycling.

   - Hazardous Waste: Hazardous materials, such as batteries, chemicals, and medical waste, are strictly regulated and typically processed separately to prevent environmental contamination.

7. Public Participation and Education

   - Public education campaigns and community programs emphasise waste reduction, recycling best practices, and proper disposal methods. Public awareness is critical to effective waste management, particularly for reducing contamination in recycling streams and encouraging composting and waste reduction efforts.

 Summary

   - Landfills: Handle about 50% of waste, with modern environmental safeguards to manage emissions and leachate.

   - Recycling: Accounts for around 32% of waste management, with varied success due to contamination and market challenges.

   - Composting: Growing at about 6% of waste management, composting reduces landfill waste and produces soil-enriching compost.

   - Incineration (WTE): Around 11%, primarily for energy recovery, especially in regions with limited landfill space.

   - Waste Reduction and EPR: Policies and programs focusing on reducing waste generation and holding producers accountable for waste.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Happy Halloween from Almost President Flossi

Halloween on October 31 traces back to ancient Celtic festivals, primarily the Gaelic festival of Samhain, which marked the end of the harvest season and the start of winter. This festival was celebrated on October 31, as it was believed that on this night, the boundary between the living and the dead was blurred, allowing spirits to roam the earth. To protect themselves from these spirits, people would light bonfires and wear costumes to ward them off.

When Christianity spread to Celtic regions, the church adapted Samhain into a Christian context by establishing All Saints' Day on November 1, also known as All Hallows' Day, with the night before (October 31) becoming All Hallows' Eve—which eventually evolved into Halloween. The church decided to place All Saints' Day near Samhain in the 8th century, aligning Christian celebrations with local traditions. Over time, Halloween combined various customs from different cultures, eventually becoming the modern celebration we know today.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi Flies Cross-Country As Race Tightens

Here’s a ranked list of U.S. presidential candidates from the last 100 years by popular vote totals:

1. Joe Biden (2020) - 81.3 million votes

2. Donald Trump (2020) - 74.2 million votes

3. Barack Obama (2008) - 69.5 million votes

4. Barack Obama (2012) - 65.9 million votes

5. Hillary Clinton (2016) - 65.8 million votes

6. Donald Trump (2016) - 62.9 million votes

7. George W. Bush (2004) - 62 million votes

8. John McCain (2008) - 59.9 million votes

9. Mitt Romney (2012) - 60.9 million votes

10. Al Gore (2000) - 50.9 million votes

In recent U.S. presidential elections, voter turnout among eligible voters has varied. The 2020 election saw one of the highest turnouts in modern history, with about 66.8% of eligible voters participating, spurred partly by expanded mail-in and early voting options due to the pandemic. By comparison, the 2016 election had a slightly lower turnout rate at 60.1% of eligible voters.

Historically, turnout fluctuates; turnout in presidential elections typically ranges from 50% to 70% among eligible voters, depending on factors like voter engagement, election dynamics, and voting accessibility in each election cycle. For example, turnout in the 2008 election, driven by solid enthusiasm, was also high at around 62% of eligible voters.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi Calling Supporters with 6 Days to Election

Presidential campaigns frequently face last-minute issues that can disrupt their momentum, shift public perception, or even alter the election's outcome. Here are some notable last-minute problems that have affected campaigns:

1. October Surprises

   - 1972 – Nixon vs. McGovern: Just before the election, National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger announced that “peace is at hand” in the Vietnam War, boosting Nixon’s re-election chances. Nixon won by a landslide, though the peace talks ultimately stalled shortly after the election.

   - 2016 – Clinton vs. Trump: FBI Director James Comey announced the reopening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails just days before the election. This led to a renewed focus on Clinton’s trustworthiness and may have influenced undecided voters. Trump won a narrow victory in crucial swing states.

 2. Health Issues

   - 1892 – Cleveland vs. Harrison: Incumbent President Benjamin Harrison's wife, Caroline, was seriously ill and passed away just before the election. Harrison reduced his campaign activities to focus on family matters, which may have impacted his ability to campaign effectively. He lost the election to Grover Cleveland.

   - 1912 – Roosevelt vs. Wilson vs. Taft: Theodore Roosevelt, running as a third-party candidate, was shot in an assassination attempt during a campaign event. Roosevelt continued campaigning after a short recovery, using the incident to emphasise his toughness, though he ultimately lost.

 3. Economic Crises

   - 2008 – Obama vs. McCain: The U.S. faced a severe financial crisis just weeks before the election, leading to stock market crashes and a recession. John McCain suspended his campaign to return to Washington and address the situation, while Barack Obama took a calm, steady approach. The crisis highlighted McCain’s unpredictability, contributing to Obama’s eventual victory.

   - 1929 – Hoover’s Stock Market Concerns: While not directly during a campaign, the stock market crash in October 1929, just after Hoover's election, contributed to negative public perception of his administration. This perception influenced the 1932 campaign, which Hoover lost to Franklin D. Roosevelt amid the Great Depression.

 4. Scandals

   - 1980 – Reagan vs. Carter: In the final days of the campaign, reports surfaced that the Carter administration had failed to secure the release of American hostages in Iran. Reagan’s campaign used this effectively, suggesting Carter's weakness in foreign policy, and Reagan won in a landslide.

   - 1992 – Clinton vs. Bush: Just days before the election, news broke of George H.W. Bush’s potential involvement in the Iran-Contra Affair during his vice presidency under Reagan. Though Bush denied any wrongdoing, the scandal reinforced the perception of him as part of a corrupt establishment.

 5. Natural Disasters

   - 2012 – Obama vs. Romney: In the final week before the election, Hurricane Sandy struck the East Coast, devastating New Jersey and New York. President Obama showed leadership in crisis management, while Mitt Romney was sidelined from actively campaigning. The disaster highlighted Obama’s handling of emergencies and may have helped solidify his re-election.

 6. Endorsements and Defections

   - 1976 – Ford vs. Carter: Just before the election, Ronald Reagan, who had narrowly lost the Republican nomination to incumbent Gerald Ford, offered a tepid endorsement, which may have discouraged conservative voters. Ford ultimately lost to Jimmy Carter in a close election.

   - 2000 – Bush vs. Gore: In the final days, Green Party candidate Ralph Nader, who had strong support among liberals, refused to endorse Al Gore, likely siphoning away votes that could have helped Gore in key states like Florida. The race came down to a few hundred votes in Florida, leading to Bush’s victory after a contentious Supreme Court ruling.

 7. Last-Minute Polls and Media Influence

   - 1948 – Truman vs. Dewey: Polls leading up to the election consistently showed Thomas Dewey as the favorite to win. This led many newspapers and media outlets to predict a Dewey victory, perhaps causing voter complacency among Dewey supporters. Truman ultimately pulled off a surprise victory in one of the greatest election upsets in U.S. history.

   - 1988 – Bush vs. Dukakis: Just before the election, an infamous ad campaign against Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis highlighted his stance on criminal justice, specifically the “Willie Horton” ad. The ad cast doubt on Dukakis’s ability to handle crime, contributing to George H.W. Bush’s victory.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi Floating on Puerto Rico in Florida

The states with the largest populations of Puerto Rican voters are primarily in the Northeast and Florida, due to historical migration patterns and recent relocations from Puerto Rico. Here’s a look at the top states:

 1. Florida

   - Florida has one of the largest Puerto Rican populations, especially in areas like Orlando, Tampa, and Miami. The influx of Puerto Ricans has increased significantly since Hurricane Maria in 2017, with many moving to central Florida. Puerto Rican voters are an influential demographic here due to their size and strong civic engagement.

 2. New York

   - New York has a long-standing Puerto Rican community, particularly in New York City and surrounding areas. Historically, New York had the largest Puerto Rican population on the mainland, and Puerto Rican voters remain an important constituency in the state.

 3. New Jersey

   - New Jersey, particularly in cities like Newark, Paterson, and Jersey City, has a sizable Puerto Rican community. Puerto Rican voters play a significant role in local and state elections here due to their concentrated presence.

 4. Pennsylvania

   - Pennsylvania, especially in cities like Philadelphia and Allentown, has a growing Puerto Rican population. Puerto Rican voters are influential in local elections, particularly in areas with concentrated Puerto Rican communities.

 5. Massachusetts

   - Massachusetts, notably in cities like Springfield, Worcester, and Boston, has a significant Puerto Rican population. Puerto Rican voters are particularly influential in areas with a high concentration of Latino voters.

These states’ Puerto Rican communities often participate actively in elections, with Florida and Pennsylvania being particularly crucial battlegrounds in national elections due to their swing-state status.

Puerto Rican voters in Florida could influence the outcome of the U.S. presidential election. Florida is a crucial swing state with a large number of electoral votes, making it highly impactful in close national elections. Puerto Ricans represent a significant portion of Florida's Latino vote, especially in the Orlando and central Florida areas.

Here are key factors that make Puerto Rican voters influential in Florida:

 1. Growing Population

   - Puerto Rican migration to Florida, particularly after Hurricane Maria in 2017, has significantly increased the number of eligible Puerto Rican voters in the state. This has increased the state's overall Latino voter base and strengthened Puerto Rican communities' presence in key areas.

 2. Swing-State Status

   - Florida’s status as a swing state makes every vote critical in close races. With a diverse population, slight shifts among voting groups can tip the state toward one candidate. Puerto Ricans, often politically active, can be a decisive group in tight elections.

 3. Distinct Voting Patterns

   - Puerto Rican voters in Florida tend to lean Democratic overall, though this can vary based on specific candidates and issues. Compared to other Latino groups in Florida, Puerto Ricans are less reliably aligned with the Republican Party, adding an unpredictable and potentially decisive element in Florida's elections.

 4. High Engagement and Mobilization Efforts

   - Both parties heavily campaigned in Puerto Rican communities in Florida due to their potential impact. Community organisations also work to mobilise Puerto Rican voters, especially on issues of interest like healthcare, economic recovery, and policies impacting Puerto Rico directly.

In a close election, the Puerto Rican vote in Florida can be influential enough to tip the state's electoral votes, which in turn can affect the overall outcome of the presidential race.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

What’s Black and White and …

Between 1850 and 1934, newspaper endorsements for presidential candidates evolved alongside the growing influence of mass media in American politics. Although the power of endorsements may have been different in the earlier period compared to the 20th century, here are some notable endorsements and trends during that time:

 1. The New York Times

   - 1872: Endorsed Horace Greeley (Liberal Republican), who also ran on the Democratic ticket against Ulysses S. Grant. Despite Greeley being the founder of another prominent newspaper (*The New York Tribune*), The New York Times supported him due to dissatisfaction with Grant’s first term.

   - 1912: Endorsed Woodrow Wilson (Democratic) during the contentious three-way race against William Howard Taft (Republican) and Theodore Roosevelt (Progressive/Bull Moose Party). Wilson’s endorsement came during a split Republican Party, and The Times favoured his progressive vision.

 2. The Chicago Tribune

   - 1860: Endorsed Abraham Lincoln (Republican) in his first successful bid for the presidency. Lincoln’s association with Illinois made this endorsement significant, and the Chicago Tribune strongly supported his candidacy and abolitionist ideals.

 3. The Cincinnati Gazette

   - 1856: Endorsed John C. Frémont (Republican), the first-ever Republican candidate. The Cincinnati Gazette supported the abolitionist movement and the new Republican Party early, backing Frémont as part of a broader movement opposing slavery.

   

 4. The New York Herald

   - 1876: Endorsed Samuel J. Tilden (Democratic) in the highly contested election against Rutherford B. Hayes (Republican). The endorsement reflected the paper’s opposition to the Reconstruction policies of the Republicans and their preference for reconciliation with the South.

 5. The Boston Globe

   - 1896: Endorsed William Jennings Bryan (Democratic/Populist). The Boston Globe and many other progressive newspapers supported Bryan’s campaign, which focused on the free silver movement and championing the working class.

 6. The Los Angeles Times

   - 1912: Endorsed Theodore Roosevelt (Progressive) in his third-party run against incumbent Taft and Democratic candidate Wilson. The LA Times supported Roosevelt’s progressive policies and his “trust-busting” legacy.

 7. The Atlanta Constitution

   - 1932: Endorsed Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) in his first bid for the presidency. This endorsement was part of a broader Southern shift toward the Democratic Party during the Great Depression, favouring Roosevelt’s promise of a New Deal and economic recovery.

 8. The Baltimore Sun

   - 1864: Endorsed Abraham Lincoln (Republican) for re-election during the Civil War. Though Maryland was a border state, The Baltimore Sun supported Lincoln’s leadership and the Union cause.

 9. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

   - 1900: Endorsed William McKinley (Republican) for re-election, favouring his pro-business policies and the continuation of economic prosperity following the Spanish-American War.

 10. The Philadelphia Inquirer

   - 1876: Endorsed Rutherford B. Hayes (Republican), in a critical election marked by electoral disputes. The paper supported the Republican stance on Reconstruction and Hayes’s commitment to economic recovery.

 General Trends:

   Rise of Partisan Newspapers: In the 19th century, many newspapers were openly affiliated with political parties, so endorsements were often predictable and tied to the paper’s broader editorial stance. For example, Republican-leaning papers like The New York Tribune always backed Republican candidates, while Democratic-leaning papers supported Democrats.

   - Shift Toward Objectivity: By the early 20th century, some newspapers began to adopt a more independent or centrist approach, though political endorsements still reflected editorial biases.

   - Populist Movements: The endorsements of William Jennings Bryan in 1896 and Theodore Roosevelt’s third-party run in 1912 reflected a growing endorsement of more populist or progressive candidates during periods of economic uncertainty and calls for reform.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi Outside Madison Square Garden

The German American Bund rally held at Madison Square Garden on February 20, 1939, drew 22,000 participants and featured a giant portrait of George Washington flanked by swastikas.

 The event was met with fierce protests by anti-Nazi demonstrators, and it ultimately backfired, drawing widespread condemnation of the Bund's activities. The event marked the height of the organisation's influence but also led to its rapid downfall.

The Bund's leader, Fritz Julius Kuhn, gave a provocative speech attacking President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Jewish influence, but the rally attracted widespread public condemnation.

Kuhn was soon after arrested for embezzling funds from the organisation, convicted of larceny and forgery, and sentenced to prison.

Following his release after World War II, Kuhn was deported to Germany, where he lived quietly until he died in 1951.

The German American Bund sought to create a “Nazi America” by promoting a combination of American patriotism and Nazi ideology. Its members, primarily German-Americans, held rallies, published propaganda, and operated youth camps such as Camp Siegfried in New York and Camp Nordland in New Jersey.

The Bund's roots can be traced to earlier Nazi-supporting groups.

Friends of New Germany (FoNG) was founded in 1933 with the help of the German government. The goal was to unite various Nazi groups in the U.S. and spread Nazi propaganda. It was formed by merging two smaller groups: Gau-USA and the Free Society of Teutonia.

   

   However, by the mid-1930s, the Nazi government in Germany distanced itself from the FoNG, fearing its activities were damaging relations with the U.S. In December 1935, German officials ordered all German nationals to leave the group, and its leadership was recalled to Germany.

After the dissolution of FoNG, the German American Bund was established in 1936 under Fritz Julius Kuhn, a naturalised U.S. citizen of German descent and a World War I veteran. 

 Key Individuals:

1. Fritz Julius Kuhn (Bundesführer):

   Role: Kuhn was the leader of the German American Bund and its most visible figure. A charismatic speaker, Kuhn sought to rally support for Nazi ideals within the German-American community. He was heavily involved in organising rallies, including the infamous 1939 Madison Square Garden rally, which featured Nazi symbols alongside American flags.

   Downfall: In late 1939, Kuhn was arrested and convicted of embezzling $14,000 from the Bund. He was sentenced to two and a half to five years in prison for larceny and forgery.

2. Gerhard Wilhelm Kunze:

   Successor to Kuhn: Gerhard Kunze became the Bund’s leader after Kuhn's arrest. Kunze was a spy for German military intelligence, and his leadership saw the Bund increasingly scrutinised by U.S. authorities.

Capture: Kunze fled the U.S. to Mexico after the U.S. entered World War II but was captured and extradited to the U.S., where he was sentenced to 15 years in prison for espionage【254†source】.

3. August Klapprott:

   - Bund Leader in New Jersey: Klapprott was one of the regional leaders of the Bund. After the U.S. entered the war, Klapprott was arrested and interned as a dangerous enemy alien under the authority of the Alien Enemies Act.

   

4. Rudolf Markmann:

   - Camp Siegfried Leader: Markmann was a regional leader who oversaw Camp Siegfried, a Nazi-style youth camp on Long Island, New York. The camp was part of the Bund's efforts to indoctrinate young German Americans into Nazi ideology. Markmann was one of several Bund leaders arrested after the group was disbanded.

Many rank-and-file members were left alone after the Bund disbanded.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi at the Rodeo in Texas

The Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association (PRCA), originally known as the Cowboys' Turtle Association (CTA), is the largest and oldest governing body for professional rodeo. Here's a detailed history of the PRCA:

Origins: The Cowboys' Turtle Association (1936)

The PRCA's origins date back to 1936 when rodeo cowboys at the Boston Garden rodeo protested against unfair treatment and low prize money. At the time, promoters often paid little attention to the competitors’ welfare and winnings. Cowboys were also usually required to pay hefty entry fees without guaranteeing equal prize money distribution. After threatening to strike, the cowboys secured better pay and conditions.

As a result of their success, the Cowboys' Turtle Association (CTA) was formed. The name "Turtle" was chosen humorously, implying that while they may have been slow to act (like turtles), they eventually took decisive action. This marked the first significant attempt to organise rodeo cowboys and protect their interests.

 Formation of the Rodeo Cowboys Association (1945)

In 1945, the CTA evolved into the Rodeo Cowboys Association (RCA), reflecting its broader role as a national governing body. The RCA formalised rules and standardised events and helped elevate rodeo from a rough-around-the-edges spectacle to a legitimate professional sport. The RCA began sanctioning rodeos across the United States, ensuring consistency and fairness in prize distribution, cowboy safety, and animal welfare.

 Growth and Rebranding to PRCA (1975)

In 1975, the RCA rebranded itself as the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association (PRCA) to better reflect the sport's growing professionalism and increasing mainstream appeal. By this time, the PRCA had become the leading rodeo organisation, sanctioning over 500 rodeos annually.

The PRCA oversees seven traditional rodeo events:

1. Bareback Riding

2. Steer Wrestling

3. Team Roping

4. Saddle Bronc Riding

5. Tie-Down Roping

6. Barrel Racing (sanctioned by the Women's Professional Rodeo Association)

7. Bull Riding

 National Finals Rodeo (NFR)

In 1959, the PRCA established the National Finals Rodeo (NFR), the premier championship event in rodeo, often called the "Super Bowl of Rodeo." The NFR was initially held in Dallas, then Oklahoma City, and eventually moved to its current location in Las Vegas, Nevada, in 1985. The top 15 competitors in each event qualify for the NFR, where they compete for the title of World Champion.

 Impact and Modern-Day PRCA

Today, the PRCA sanctions over 600 rodeos annually across the U.S., with over 7,000 members ranging from cowboys to stock contractors, rodeo committees, and judges. The PRCA has been instrumental in ensuring the sport’s growth, establishing fair play, enhancing safety standards, and maintaining animal welfare protocols.

The association continues to uphold its mission of promoting the sport of rodeo while safeguarding the interests of its athletes. It has also embraced modern technologies like live streaming and broadcasting rodeo events through platforms like the Cowboy Channel.

 Key Achievements:

- Rule Standardization: The PRCA established uniform rules and procedures for events, ensuring fairness across rodeos.

- Animal Welfare: The PRCA has strict guidelines to protect the welfare of rodeo animals.

- Rodeo Promotion: The PRCA's efforts have significantly increased the visibility and popularity of rodeo, mainly through the NFR and national television broadcasts.

In sum, the PRCA has played a pivotal role in transforming rodeo from a loosely organised entertainment form into a respected professional sport while continuing to champion cowboy values and traditions.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi Calls for Physical Fitness

The health of the U.S. population is a major public concern, especially regarding obesity and related health issues. The obesity rate has been increasing over the years and is now considered a significant public health crisis.

 Obesity Statistics:

- 42.4% of U.S. adults were classified as obese in 2017–2018, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This marked the first time the national obesity rate passed 40%.

- The CDC also notes that an additional 9.2% of adults fall under the category of severe obesity.

 Health Problems Related to Obesity:

Obesity is linked to numerous health problems, including:

- Heart disease

- Stroke

- Type 2 diabetes

- Certain cancers

  

These conditions are among the leading causes of preventable, premature death in the U.S. The CDC estimates that 300,000 deaths per year are related to obesity.

 Financial and Social Impact:

- The medical costs of obesity in the U.S. were estimated at $173 billion in 2019. Individuals who are obese have medical costs that are approximately $1,861 higher than those of average weight.

 Impact on Children:

Childhood obesity is also a growing issue. About 19.7% of children and adolescents (ages 2–19) in the U.S. are obese, which increases their risk for health problems as they age, including the early onset of type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and other conditions previously seen mainly in adults.

 Contributing Factors:

Several factors contribute to the nation's health issues, including:

- Poor diet (high in processed foods, sugar, and unhealthy fats)

- Sedentary lifestyle (lack of regular physical activity)

- Socioeconomic factors (access to affordable healthy food and healthcare)

- Stress and mental health issues that contribute to unhealthy habits.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi Appears at the CNN Town Hall

The concept of the Town Hall format on television for presidential campaigns became popular in the 1992 U.S. presidential election. This marked the first time a presidential debate was conducted in a Town Hall style, which allowed undecided voters to ask the candidates questions directly.

The 1992 Town Hall Debate

   - Candidates: The debate featured Bill Clinton (Democrat), George H. W. Bush (Republican, incumbent), and Ross Perot (Independent). It took place on October 15, 1992 in Richmond, Virginia.

   - Format: The town hall debate allowed undecided voters from the audience to ask questions directly to the candidates. This departed from the traditional format where journalists or moderators posed queries. The format created a more personal and interactive experience, encouraging candidates to engage more directly with voters rather than focus solely on policy statements.

   Impact: The debate is remembered for several moments, including a misstep by President George H. W. Bush. He was caught checking his watch while a voter was asking a question about economic hardship, which came off as dismissive. On the other hand, Bill Clinton thrived in the format, showing empathy and connecting with voters personally, which helped boost his appeal.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi Calls for New U.N. Leadership

The most recent data from 2022 shows that the United Nations employs approximately 37,000 staff across its various organisations globally.

In terms of financial contributions, the United States is the largest donor to the United Nations, contributing more than $18 billion in 2022, which accounted for about one-third of the organisation’s collective budget. This includes both assessed and voluntary contributions. China and Japan follow the U.S. as the second and third most significant contributors.

The top echelon of the United Nations is compensated according to specific guidelines overseen by the International Civil Service Commission (ICSC), which is responsible for ensuring competitive conditions for UN staff.

- Secretary-General Salary: The UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, earns an annual salary of approximately $227,253. Benefits like housing supplement this figure (Guterres resides in a provided townhouse in New York) and diplomatic privileges.


The United Nations Secretary-Genera resides at 3 Sutton Place in Manhattan, New York City. The townhouse was built in 1921 for Anne Morgan and donated to the United Nations in 1972.

Other Senior Officials: Other high-ranking UN officials, such as Under-Secretaries-General and Assistant Secretaries-General, earn between $200,000 and $250,000 annually, depending on their roles and duty stations.

In addition to base salaries, these officials also receive "post adjustments," additional allowances based on the cost of living in their respective duty stations.

Corruption and bribery at the United Nations have been issues of concern over the years, with various scandals highlighting vulnerabilities in the organisation's oversight. One significant case involved John Ashe, a former President of the UN General Assembly, charged in 2015 for his role in a $1.3 million bribery scheme. Ashe solicited and accepted bribes from businesspeople in exchange for advocating their interests within the UN and with senior officials in his home country of Antigua.

Another recurring issue involves sexual misconduct and cover-ups within UN peacekeeping missions and humanitarian operations. Investigations have revealed that some officials used their positions to engage in sexual exploitation or harassment, and there have been cases where these offences were not adequately addressed, leading to a perception of a "culture of corruption".

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi Celebrates the New York Liberty Championship

MYTH: The WNBA doesn't make any money.

FACT: The WNBA's revenue grew 233% in 2023 from $60M in 2022 to $200M. Note - The NBA only became "profitable" in the 90's after operating for 20-30 years.
The Women's National Basketball Association (WNBA) was founded on April 24, 1996, as the women's counterpart to the National Basketball Association (NBA), with league play beginning in 1997. Here's an overview of its history and financial situation:

History:

- Inception: The WNBA was created to provide a professional league for women's basketball, which saw a surge in popularity following the success of the U.S. women's basketball team in international competitions.

Expansion and Challenges: The league expanded rapidly, adding teams in the early 2000s. However, it faced various challenges, including team relocations and foldings due to financial difficulties. Notably, the Houston Comets, a dominant team in the league's early years, folded due to financial issues, marking a significant moment in the league's history.

- Growth and Recognition: Over the years, the WNBA has seen moments of significant growth, particularly with the rise of high-profile players and increased media attention. The league has also been at the forefront of social activism, contributing to its cultural impact.

Financial Situation:

Revenue Growth: Recent data indicates that the WNBA has experienced substantial revenue growth. For instance, from 2019 to 2023, revenue doubled before further increasing dramatically, with reports of revenue reaching up to $200 million in 2023. This growth is attributed to several factors, including new media deals, increased viewership, and the impact of new stars like Caitlin Clark.

  

- Profitability: Despite the revenue growth, the WNBA has never turned an annual profit in its history, with estimates suggesting losses of around $10 million per year historically, although there was mention of an expected $50 million loss for a recent season due to new expenses like charter flights. This situation has led to debates over player salaries and league sustainability.

- Investments and Financial Structure: The league has seen significant investments, with a notable capital raise that introduced new investors alongside existing NBA and WNBA ownership, aiming to bolster its financial stability. This includes a deal where investors gained a priority return on their investment, indicating a strategic move towards possibly reducing annual losses or aiming for profitability in the long term.

Player Salaries and CBA: The WNBA's financial model significantly affects player salaries, with rookies earning relatively modest base salaries. However, salary increases are expected or even possible with the upcoming negotiation of a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and more lucrative media deals on the horizon.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi’s Fast-Food French Fries

The cost of living varies significantly between states and often aligns with differences in average wages, but not always in a direct proportion. States with higher wages tend to have a higher cost of living, while states with lower wages often have a more affordable cost of living. Here's how the cost of living compares in broad terms:

 1. High-Wage, High-Cost States

   States like Massachusetts, California, Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey have some of the highest average wages in the country but also some of the highest living costs. Significant factors contributing to this include:

   Housing Costs are especially high in cities like New York City, San Francisco, and Boston, where housing prices and rent are well above the national average.

   Taxes: Some of these states have higher state income and property taxes, which increase the cost of living.

   - General Living Expenses: Food, healthcare, utilities, and transportation costs are more expensive in these regions.

 2. Moderate-Wage, Moderate-Cost States

   States like Colorado, Maryland, Illinois, and Oregon have wages close to or above the national average, and their cost of living is also higher than average but more moderate than the states mentioned above. For example:

   - Housing is still relatively expensive, particularly in urban areas, but tends to be more affordable than in California or New York.

   - Everyday expenses like groceries, gas, and utilities are priced higher but not exorbitantly.

 3. Low-Wage, Low-Cost States

   States like Mississippi, Arkansas, West Virginia, and Alabama have lower wages and lower living costs. These areas generally see:

   - Lower housing costs: Home prices and rents are much more affordable in rural and smaller cities, often significantly below the national average.

   - Lower overall living expenses: Groceries, utilities, and transportation tend to be more affordable as well, though incomes are also lower.

 4. Notable Exceptions

   Some states, like Hawaii and Alaska, have relatively high average wages and highly high living costs due to their geographical isolation and dependency on imports for essential goods. Hawaii, in particular, has very high housing costs and expensive groceries.

 Cost of Living Index

To give more context, here’s a general idea of how different states rank in terms of cost of living, using the Cost of Living Index (COLI), where 100 is the national average:

- High-Cost States:

  - Hawaii (191.8)

  - California (142.2)

  - New York (139.1)

  - Massachusetts (135.0)

  

- Moderate-Cost States:

  - Colorado (110.4)

  - Illinois (98.7)

  - Maryland (128.4)

- Low-Cost States:

  - Mississippi (84.9)

  - Arkansas (87.8)

  - West Virginia (88.1)

  - Alabama (89.3)

 Factors Influencing Cost of Living

1 Housing prices are the most significant factor in cost-of-living differences.

2. Taxes: State and local taxes vary widely, affecting take-home pay.

3. Healthcare: Medical costs can differ, especially in states with fewer medical providers.

4. Transportation: Fuel, vehicle, and public transportation expenses vary by region.

5. Goods and Services: Daily living expenses, including groceries, utilities, and other services, can fluctuate significantly.

 Comparison summary

- High wage/high cost: Massachusetts, California, New York

- Low wage/low cost: Mississippi, West Virginia, Alabama

- Moderate wage/moderate cost: Illinois, Colorado, Oregon

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi in Philadelphia

View this email in your browser

Flossi in Philadelphia

Send to a friend.
Follow the campaign.
Click the image for interesting historical information about U.S. elections. You might be surprised.

Based on the information available up to October 19, 2024, the states with the highest and lowest voter turnout can be summarized as follows:

- Highest Voter Turnout:

- Minnesota has consistently been noted for high voter turnout, with figures like 79.96% in recent elections, often ranking at the top.

- Following closely, states like Maine, Colorado, Wisconsin, and Washington have also shown high voter turnout rates, typically in the mid to high 70% range for presidential elections.

- Lowest Voter Turnout:

- Oklahoma frequently appears at or near the bottom, with turnout rates around 54.99% in recent analyses.

- Other states often mentioned for lower turnout include Arkansas, West Virginia, Hawaii, Tennessee, and Texas, where turnout percentages can hover around or below 60% in presidential elections.

These statistics are generally based on the voting-eligible population (VEP) rather than just the voting age population (VAP), which gives a more accurate representation of voter participation by accounting for ineligible voters like non-citizens or felons in some states.

The reasons for these turnout levels can vary widely, including state election laws, voter suppression or facilitation efforts, demographic composition, political culture, and the competitiveness of elections in those states. For instance, states with significant efforts towards voter education, easier access to voting (like mail-in voting or longer early voting periods), or competitive elections might see higher turnout, whereas states with restrictive voting laws or where elections are less contested might see lower turnout.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Play Ball: Flossi at the 2024 World Series

Today's World Series significantly differs from the World Series of the 1960s in several ways. Here are some of the most notable changes:

 1. Structure and Playoff Format

   - 1960s: The World Series in the 1960s was a simple best-of-seven series between the champions of the American League (AL) and the National League (NL). There were no other rounds of playoffs, and the pennant winners from each league went straight to the World Series.

   - Today: The World Series is the final round of a much larger playoff system, including a Wild Card Round, Division Series, and League Championship Series (ALCS and NLCS). The playoff field has expanded to include several teams from each league, making it a more competitive and extended postseason.

 2. Number of Teams

   - 1960s: In the 1960s, Major League Baseball (MLB) had fewer teams—20 by the end of the decade, 10 in each league. Expansion teams like the Houston Astros and Montreal Expos were beginning to enter the league.

   - Today, MLB has 30 teams, 15 in each league, which makes for a more extensive and diverse pool of competitors.

 3. Interleague Play

   - 1960s: There was no interleague play during the regular season. AL and NL teams only faced each other in the World Series or All-Star Game. The leagues were more distinct, with different rules, umpires, and even slightly different baseballs.

   - Today, Interleague play happens throughout the regular season, and the two leagues are much more integrated. Players and teams are more familiar with their counterparts from the opposite league.

 4. Designated Hitter (DH) Rule

   - 1960s: The AL and NL pitchers batted in the World Series, as the DH rule did not exist. The strategy of managing pitchers who could hit was a part of the game.

   Today: Since 2022, the DH has been used in both leagues, meaning pitchers no longer bat in the World Series or during the regular season in the NL. This change impacts teams' overall strategy and lineup construction.

 5. Technology and Media Coverage

   1960s: World Series games were broadcast on television, but the technology was more limited. There were fewer camera angles, no instant replay, and basic statistics presented during the game.

   - Today: The World Series benefits from high-definition broadcasts, multiple camera angles, instant replay for close plays, and advanced analytics shown on-screen. There are also more outlets for coverage, including streaming services and social media, which offer real-time updates and fan interaction.

 6. Global Reach and Player Pool

   - 1960s: While international players were in the league, MLB was still heavily dominated by U.S. players, with only a small number of players from Latin America and virtually none from Asia or other regions.

   - Today, MLB has a much more diverse talent pool, with many players from countries like Japan, South Korea, the Dominican Republic, Venezuela, and Cuba, making the game more global.

 7. Salaries and Free Agency

   - 1960s: Players earned relatively modest salaries compared to today's standards, and no free agency existed. Players were often tied to the team that signed them for their entire career unless they were traded.

   - Today, Free agency has dramatically changed the financial dynamics of the game. Players can move between teams more freely, and salaries for star players can reach hundreds of millions of dollars.

 8. Stadiums

   - 1960s: Many teams still played in old-fashioned ballparks with smaller capacities and limited amenities.

   - Today, Modern stadiums are more prominent, with better facilities for fans and players. Many are designed with retractable roofs, luxury suites, and advanced amenities, creating a different atmosphere for the games.

 9. Game Pace and Strategy

   - 1960s: Games were generally faster, with fewer pitching changes and more reliance on starting pitchers going deep into games.

   - Today: The game is slower, with more pitching changes and an emphasis on analytics, which can lead to more frequent strategic decisions like shifts, defensive alignments, and bullpen management.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi Reads JFK’s Speech at the 1960 Al Smith Dinner

October 19, 1960

Senator KENNEDY. Your Eminence Cardinal Spellman, Mr. Silver, Mr. Vice President, Governor Rockefeller, Mayor Wagner, Mrs. Warner, Members of the Senate, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, fellow voters [laughter], I am glad to be here at this notable dinner once again, and I am glad that Mr. Nixon is here, also. [Applause]. Now that Cardinal Spellman has demonstrated the proper spirit, I assume that shortly I will be invited to a Quaker dinner honoring Herbert Hoover. [Laughter.]

Cardinal Spellman is the only man so widely respected in American politics that he could bring together amicably, at the same banquet table, for the first time in this campaign, two political leaders who are increasingly apprehensive about the November election [laughter] who have long eyed each other suspiciously, and who have disagreed so strongly, both publicly and privately, Vice President Nixon and Governor Rockefeller [laughter].

Mr. Nixon, like the rest of us, has had his troubles in this campaign. At one point even the Wall Street Journal was criticizing his tactics. That is like the Observatore Romano criticizing the Pope. [Laughter.]

But I think the worst news for the Republicans this week was that Casey Stengel has been fired. [Laughter.] It must show that perhaps experience does not count. [Laughter and applause.]

On this matter of experience, I had announced earlier this year that if successful I would not consider campaign contributions as a substitute for experience in appointing ambassadors. Ever since I made that statement I have not received one single cent from my father. [Laughter and applause.]

One of the inspiring notes that was struck in the last debate was struck by the Vice President in his very moving warning to the children of the Nation and the candidates against the use of profanity by Presidents and ex-Presidents when they are on the stump. And I know after 14 years in the Congress with the Vice President that he was very sincere in his views about the use of profanity. But I am told that a prominent Republican said to him yesterday in Jacksonville, Fla., "Mr. President, that was a damn fine speech." [Laughter.] And the Vice President said, "I appreciate the compliment but not the language." And the Republican went on, "Yes, sir, I liked it so much that I contributed a thousand dollars to your campaign." And Mr. Nixon replied, "The hell you say." [Laughter and applause.]

However, I would not want to give the impression that I am taking former President Truman's use of language lightly. I have sent him the following wire:

DEAR MR. PRESIDENT: I have noted with interest your suggestion as to where those who vote for my opponent should go. While I understand and sympathize with your deep motivation, I. think it is important that our side try to refrain from raising the religious issue.

[Laughter and applause.]

One of the subjects that interests candidates and those who write about candidates is whether 1960 will be another 1928. I have had some interest in that question myself, and looking at the speeches of Governor Smith in the 1928 campaign, I am struck by the continuity of the themes. The 1928 and 1960 campaign, with all of the obvious differences, have much in common. In 1928, as in 1960, the Yankees won the penant, the Postmaster General was promising efficient mail delivery at last, farm purchasing power was down some 20 percent in 1928 compared to 8 years earlier, just as it is today. Three million people had left the farms in that period, just as they have in the last 8 years. The stock market was unstable and two-thirds of all corporate profits went to one-fourth of 1 percent of the corporations.

In September 1928, the Republican candidate for the Presidency declared:

Real wages have improved more during the past 7 1/2 years than in any similar period in the history of our country.

He spoke of the country's unparalleled progress. He stressed American comfort, hope, and confidence for the future are immeasurably higher than they were 7 1/2 years ago.

The Democratic candidate in 1928 questioned how stable our prosperity was. He pointed to the pockets of industries. We warned of a farm depression. He criticized administration farm vetoes. He stressed, and I quote him, "The necessity for the restoration of cordial relations with Latin America" and he called for more effective action against disarmament.

The Democratic nominee in 1928 spoke 30 years ago tonight about building a stronger America, strengthening not only our economy but our sense of moral purpose and our public duty. In all of these and other ways, 1960 and 1928 may be sisters under the skin.

Some say that this will also be true when the ballots are counted, that the religious convictions of the candidates will influence the outcome more than their convictions on the issues. But this is where I believe that 1928 and 1960 are very different. Regardless of the outcome, and regardless of these similarities, I do not believe the American voter in 1960 is the same as the American voter of 1928, for we live in a different world.

There are a billion more people crowding our globe, and every American can hear the rumbling of a distant drum. The next President will have a budget 25 times as large as that of the candidates in Al Smith's time, and he will face problems unprecedented in that time or in any time in our long history, automation and unemployment, farm surpluses and food shortages, a high cost of living in the midst of an economic slump, new nations, new leaders, the world is different across the street and on the other side of the moon. The white race is in the minority, the free-enterprise system is in the minority, and the majority are looking at us harder and longer than they ever looked before.

The people who live in the tenements of Africa and Asia and Latin America want to fight their way out of the slums. The lower east side of the world is looking for help, and unlike 1928 the lower east side of the world has a voice and a vote.

"The world is large," John Boyle O'Reilly wrote, "The world is large when its weary league two loving hearts divide, but the world is small when your enemy is loose on the other side."

In 1960, as never before, our enemy is loose on the other side. In 1928 the voters perhaps could be excused for not seeing the storm coming, the depression, the Japanese conquest of Manchuria, Hitler's rise, and all the rest. But in 1960, the citizens of this country face the great question of whether freedom will not only endure, but whether it will also prevail. Thus, 1960 and 1928 are very different. It will be with this view of America that we shall accept the fortunes of November 8, 1960, be they favorable or unfavorable, good or bad. The American people in 1960 see the storm coming. They see the perils ahead. 1960 is not 1928. I am confident that whatever their verdict, Republican or Democratic, myself or Mr. Nixon, that their judgment will be based not on any extraneous issue, but on the real issues of our time, on what is best for our country, on the hard facts that face us, on the convictions of the candidates and their parties, and on their ability to interpret them.

When this happens then the bitter memory of 1928 will begin to fade, and all that will remain will be the figure of Al Smith, large against the horizon, true, courageous, and honest, who in the words of the cardinal, served his country well, and having served his country well, nobly served his God. [Applause.]

John F. Kennedy, Speech of Senator John F. Kennedy, Al Smith Memorial Dinner, Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York, NY Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/274316

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi on Fox

The first significant one-on-one interview with a presidential candidate occurred in 1952 when Dwight D. Eisenhower participated in a televised interview with broadcaster Edward R. Murrow on his show See It Now. This interview was groundbreaking as it marked the early use of television to connect presidential candidates with the public, allowing them to address the electorate directly. Eisenhower's interview helped establish television as a powerful medium in political campaigns, allowing future presidential candidates to use interviews as part of their election strategy.

1. Richard Nixon’s Checkers Speech (1952): Nixon's televised speech about a campaign finance scandal helped save his vice-presidential candidacy under Dwight D. Eisenhower.

   

2. Gerald Ford’s 1976 Debate Gaffe: Ford’s claim that “there is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe” in a debate against Jimmy Carter is thought to have hurt his credibility, contributing to his loss.

3. Bill Clinton on "60 Minutes" (1992): Clinton and his wife, Hillary, addressed rumours of infidelity in an interview that helped humanise them and counteract negative perceptions.

4. Mitt Romney's "47 Percent" Comments (2012): A secretly recorded comment about 47% of Americans being dependent on government aid damaged Romney’s campaign.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

In South Korea: Flossi at the DMZ

The U.S. military presence in South Korea comprises approximately 28,500 troops as part of the United States Forces Korea (USFK). These forces are deployed under the U.S.-South Korea Mutual Defense Treaty, established after the Korean War. Key components include:

1. Eighth Army: A field army with combat and support units.

2. Seventh Air Force: Operating out of Osan Air Base, it maintains air defence and combat capabilities.

3. Naval Forces Korea (CNFK): Responsible for naval operations on the peninsula.

4. Special Operations Command Korea (SOCKOR): Provides specialised operational capabilities.

 Primary Roles:

- Deterrence: Deterring North Korean aggression, including maintaining combat readiness alongside South Korean forces.

- Combined Defense: In case of conflict, U.S. troops are integrated with South Korean forces to provide defence, including participation in joint military exercises and war games.

- Logistics & Intelligence: The U.S. provides logistical, intelligence, and command support to enhance South Korea’s defensive posture.

 Key Installations:

- Camp Humphreys: The largest U.S. military base in South Korea and Asia, housing the headquarters of the USFK.

- Osan Air Base: A significant air force hub for strategic and tactical air operations.

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

The Flossi Interview

Despite multiple requests, TIME has not been granted an interview with Kamala Harris—unlike every other Presidential candidate. We believe in transparency and publish each interview in full. Why isn’t the Vice President engaging with the public on the same level? #TrustMatters #TransparencyMatters #Leadership https://time.com/6972022/donald-trump-transcript-2024-election/… https://time.com/6984968/joe-biden-transcript-2024-interview/

Read More
Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox Campaign 2024 Pimm Fox

Flossi and the Falcon Heavy

The Falcon Heavy rocket is SpaceX’s most powerful launch vehicle, featuring 27 Merlin engines (nine per booster) and generating 5.13 million pounds of thrust at liftoff. The rocket consists of three Falcon 9 first-stage cores designed for reusability, reducing costs significantly by recovering and reusing the side boosters. Falcon Heavy can lift 64 metric tons (141,000 pounds) to low Earth orbit (LEO) and approximately 26.7 tons to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO).

Some key advancements include:

- Reuse of boosters: The rocket’s side boosters land back on Earth, ready for reuse, significantly reducing costs.

- Payload capacity: It can carry large payloads, making it ideal for launching large satellites, space probes, and crewed spacecraft for potential deep space missions.

- Flexibility: Falcon Heavy can send payloads to the Moon, Mars, and beyond, making it essential for NASA’s plans for deep space exploration and commercial missions.

 Significant Milestones:

1. Maiden Flight (February 6, 2018): The first flight of the Falcon Heavy launched Elon Musk’s Tesla Roadster into a heliocentric orbit, demonstrating the rocket's capabilities.

2. U.S. Air Force STP-2 Mission (2019): A critical demonstration of Falcon Heavy's ability to perform complex missions, delivering multiple payloads to various orbits.

3. NASA’s Artemis Program: Falcon Heavy has been selected for missions supporting NASA's Moon exploration efforts, such as the Psyche mission and Gateway station logistics.

Read More